前脚刚传内部限制使用豆包,后脚就把自己的模型开源了。
美团这波操作节奏很快。7月初,LongCat-2.0大模型正式对外开源,在开源社区引起不小反响。而就在几天前,有消息称美团内部已开始全面限制使用豆包大模型,要求业务部门迁移至LongCat、DeepSeek等模型。从买API到做模型,从内部用到对外开源,美团的AI路线图正在变得越来越清晰。
为什么大厂都要自己做模型?
美团不是第一家走这条路的大厂。阿里有通义千问、字节有豆包/云雀、腾讯有混元、百度有文心一言——中国互联网巨头几乎人手一个自研大模型。但之前大家的策略是"自研+外采"两条腿走路:重要场景用自研,一般场景用第三方API。现在风向明显在变:自研模型的优先级在提高,第三方模型的使用在收紧。
原因无非三个。第一是成本。当企业内部AI调用量达到一定规模,继续按token付费给第三方模型厂商,ROI会越来越不划算。豆包日均180万亿token的调用量虽然主要是C端,但企业级调用的成本同样惊人——腾讯给研发人员每月1400元token额度起步,就是一个明确的成本信号。自己训练模型、自己部署,长期来看边际成本会低很多。
第二是数据安全。阿里全面禁用Claude、美团限制使用豆包,核心顾虑都是数据泄露。搜索推荐算法、商家数据、用户行为数据、代码——这些都是互联网公司的核心资产,把它们输入到第三方大模型里,不管合同里怎么写保密条款,风险都是实实在在存在的。自研模型部署在自己的机房里,数据不出内网,这个问题就从根本上解决了。
第三是生态话语权。沙利文最新发布的全栈AI云服务报告显示,阿里云以40.1%的市场份额占据第一。模型不只是技术产品,也是云服务和生态的入口。把模型开源、吸引开发者用、再把开发者导流到自己的云服务上——这个路径阿里云已经走通了,美团、腾讯也在跟着走。
开源成为标配,但商业化仍然是难题
LongCat-2.0选择开源,也是大厂模型的标配操作了。DeepSeek靠开源打出了知名度、通义千问的开源版本在社区口碑很好、Llama系列更是证明了开源模型的商业价值。开源本身不赚钱,但它能建立开发者生态、收集反馈迭代模型、降低企业客户的采用门槛——相当于用免费的模型换市场份额和生态位。
但开源模型的商业化仍然是全行业的难题。Meta开源Llama但自己不直接靠模型赚钱,主要是为了生态和防御;DeepSeek还在探索商业化路径;大多数开源模型项目靠云服务、企业版、技术支持赚钱。美团的LongCat也会面临同样的问题:开源可以获得口碑,但怎么把口碑变成收入?
不过对美团来说,LongCat首先是服务内部业务的——外卖推荐、到店餐饮、酒旅、即时零售,这些场景每天都有海量的AI调用需求,先把自己的业务服务好,成本省下来就是赚到。开源是锦上添花,不是雪中送炭。
2026年下半年开始,中国大模型市场会进入一个新阶段:通用大模型的"海选"阶段结束,进入大厂自研模型+少数几家独立模型公司(如DeepSeek、月之暗面、智谱)共存的格局。创业公司再想做一个通用大模型挑战大厂,机会窗口已经基本关闭了。机会在垂直场景、在应用层、在Agent基础设施——而不是"再做一个GPT"。
Hot on the heels of reports restricting internal Doubao use, Meituan open-sources its own model.
Meituan moved fast. In early July, the LongCat-2.0 LLM was officially open-sourced to considerable buzz in the open-source community. Just days earlier, reports emerged that Meituan had begun comprehensively restricting internal use of the Doubao LLM, requiring business units to migrate to LongCat, DeepSeek, and other models. From buying APIs to building models, from internal use to open-sourcing externally, Meituan's AI roadmap is becoming increasingly clear.
Why Is Every Big Tech Company Building Its Own Model?
Meituan isn't the first to walk this path. Alibaba has Tongyi Qwen, ByteDance has Doubao/Skylark, Tencent has Hunyuan, Baidu has ERNIE — almost every Chinese internet giant has a self-developed LLM. But previously the strategy was “self-develop + buy externally” walking on two legs: self-developed for important scenarios, third-party APIs for general use. Now the wind is clearly shifting: self-developed models are rising in priority, and third-party model usage is tightening.
The reasons come down to three. First is cost. When internal AI call volume reaches a certain scale, continuing to pay third-party model vendors per token delivers diminishing ROI. Doubao's 180 trillion daily tokens are primarily consumer traffic, but enterprise-level call costs are similarly staggering — Tencent giving developers 1,400 RMB/month starting token quotas is a clear cost signal. Training your own model and deploying it yourself yields much lower marginal costs long-term.
Second is data security. Alibaba's blanket Claude ban and Meituan's Doubao restrictions are both driven by core concerns about data leakage. Search and recommendation algorithms, merchant data, user behavior data, code — these are internet companies' core assets; inputting them into third-party LLMs carries real risk regardless of what confidentiality clauses say in contracts. Self-developed models deployed in your own server rooms, with data never leaving the intranet, solves this problem fundamentally.
Third is ecosystem leverage. According to Sullivan's latest full-stack AI cloud services report, Alibaba Cloud holds the #1 position with 40.1% market share. Models aren't just technology products; they're entry points for cloud services and ecosystems. Open-sourcing a model, attracting developers to use it, then funneling developers to your own cloud services — Alibaba Cloud has already proven this path works, and Meituan and Tencent are following.
Open Source Becomes Standard, but Monetization Remains Hard
LongCat-2.0's choice to open-source is now standard Big Tech model practice. DeepSeek built its name through open source; Tongyi Qwen's open-source versions enjoy strong community reputation; the Llama series proved open-source models' commercial value. Open sourcing itself doesn't generate revenue, but it builds developer ecosystems, collects feedback for model iteration, and lowers enterprise customer adoption barriers — essentially trading free models for market share and ecosystem position.
But monetizing open-source models remains an industry-wide challenge. Meta open-sources Llama without directly making money from the model, primarily for ecosystem and defensive reasons; DeepSeek is still exploring monetization paths; most open-source model projects make money through cloud services, enterprise editions, and technical support. Meituan's LongCat will face the same problem: open source can earn reputation, but how do you turn reputation into revenue?
For Meituan, though, LongCat first serves internal business — food delivery recommendations, in-restaurant dining, hotel and travel, instant retail. These scenarios generate massive daily AI call volumes; serving its own business well first is already a win through cost savings. Open-sourcing is icing on the cake, not the cake itself.
Starting in H2 2026, China's LLM market enters a new phase: the ‘audition’ phase for general-purpose LLMs is over, settling into a coexistence pattern of Big Tech self-built models + a handful of independent model companies (like DeepSeek, Moonshot, Zhipu). For startups hoping to build another general-purpose LLM to challenge Big Tech, the window of opportunity has essentially closed. The opportunities are in vertical scenarios, at the application layer, in Agent infrastructure — not in “building another GPT.”
大厂做模型就像大厂做云——一开始都是为了服务自己,做着做着发现可以卖给别人了。
—— 一位云行业分析师
Big Tech building models is like Big Tech building cloud — it starts with serving yourself, and before you know it you can sell it to others too.
— A cloud industry analyst
Meituan · LongCat-2.0 · open-source LLM · self-built models · AI costs · data security · Big Tech AI strategy · LLM commercialization
Sources · 信源 Sources
本文基于 Dawn Vision 认知引擎处理的 7 个源信号生成,经编辑部人工审核。素材来源:36氪、今日头条、沙利文报告。
This article was generated from 7 source signals processed by the Dawn Vision cognitive engine, with editorial review. Sources: 36Kr, Toutiao, Sullivan Report.