6.8万个候选,4种全新材料,全部经过实验验证。
7月3日,阿里达摩院联合中国人民大学、中国科学院大学发布了行业内首个超导材料发现AI智能体ElementsClaw。这个AI系统预测了6.8万个可能的超导材料,其中4种全新材料已经在实验室合成并证实存在超导性。相关数据已全部开放,供全球学界进一步挖掘。这不是又一个AI发论文的故事——这是AI真正在实验室里做出科学发现的案例。
从"猜"到"找":AI重新定义材料科学
超导材料的发现历史上充满了偶然。1911年荷兰物理学家Onnes发现汞的超导性,是在一次实验意外中观察到的;1986年铜基高温超导体的发现,拿了诺贝尔奖但过程也充满试错;2023年韩国团队的LK-99室温超导乌龙,更是让全球围观了一次"全民炼丹"。材料科学的传统范式就是:科学家基于经验提出假设,然后在实验室里一个一个试,效率极低,高度依赖直觉和运气。
ElementsClaw改变了这个游戏规则。它不是随机猜测,而是基于对元素周期律、晶体结构、电子相互作用的深度学习,系统性地筛选可能的超导材料组合。6.8万个候选不是瞎猜的,是AI在理解物理化学规律基础上给出的"高概率名单"——这把科学家的搜索空间从天文数字缩小到了可实验验证的范围。
更关键的是"已获实验验证"这几个字。AI for Science领域过去几年发了大量论文,但很多停留在"计算预测"阶段,真正走进实验室、被实验证实的并不多。达摩院这次的成果,4种新材料已经合成并测量到了超导信号,说明AI的预测不是纸上谈兵。
AI for Science的商业化路径
量子位同日的另一篇报道提到,黄仁勋反复强调的Physical AI正在被中国公司带入生命科学实验室。AI for Science正在从学术概念变成产业工具:药物发现、材料设计、蛋白质折叠、气候模拟、量子计算控制——这些领域都在被AI加速。
材料科学的市场价值是巨大的。超导材料如果能在室温常压下实现,将彻底改变电力传输、核磁共振、量子计算、可控核聚变等领域。即使是"传统"的高温超导材料,在可控核聚变托卡马克装置、核磁共振成像、粒子加速器等领域也有刚性需求。AI加速材料发现的速度,意味着这些应用的商业化可能比预期来得更早。
达摩院选择把数据全部开放,也是一个聪明的策略。科学发现本身是公共品,开放数据可以吸引全球研究者参与验证和迭代,加速整个领域的进步。同时,阿里也能通过这个成果建立在AI for Science领域的品牌认知,吸引相关人才和合作机会。
AI for Science不是一个新故事了,但2026年它正在从"demo"走向"生产力"。DeepMind的AlphaFold改变了蛋白质结构预测,现在ElementsClaw这样的系统开始改变材料发现。当AI能够真正在实验室里做出发现,而不只是在论文里画表格的时候,科研的范式就真的变了。
68,000 candidates, 4 new materials, all experimentally verified.
On July 3, Alibaba DAMO Academy, together with Renmin University of China and University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, released ElementsClaw, the industry's first AI Agent for superconductor discovery. This AI system predicted 68,000 potential superconducting materials, of which 4 new materials have been synthesized in the lab and confirmed to exhibit superconductivity. All data has been released openly for further exploration by the global research community. This isn't another story of AI publishing papers — it's a case of AI genuinely making scientific discoveries in the lab.
From “Guessing” to “Finding”: AI Redefines Materials Science
The history of superconductor discovery is full of accidents. In 1911 Dutch physicist Onnes discovered mercury's superconductivity through an experimental accident; the 1986 discovery of copper-based high-temperature superconductors won a Nobel Prize but was full of trial and error; in 2023 the Korean LK-99 room-temperature superconductor fiasco had the whole world watching a round of “mass alchemy.” The traditional materials science paradigm is: scientists propose hypotheses based on experience, then test them one by one in the lab — extremely inefficient, heavily dependent on intuition and luck.
ElementsClaw changes the rules of this game. It doesn't guess randomly; it systematically screens potential superconductor combinations through deep learning of periodic laws, crystal structures, and electron interactions. The 68,000 candidates aren't blind guesses — they're a “high-probability shortlist” AI generates from understanding physical chemistry laws, shrinking scientists' search space from astronomical numbers to experimentally verifiable ranges.
Most critically, the words “experimentally verified.” AI for Science has produced plenty of papers in recent years, but many remain at the “computational prediction” stage; few actually make it into the lab and get experimentally confirmed. DAMO's result has 4 new materials synthesized with measured superconducting signals, proving AI predictions aren't just academic exercises.
The Commercial Path for AI for Science
A separate QbitAI report the same day noted that the Physical AI concept Jensen Huang repeatedly emphasizes is being brought into life science labs by Chinese companies. AI for Science is moving from academic concept to industrial tool: drug discovery, materials design, protein folding, climate simulation, quantum computing control — all being accelerated by AI.
The market value of materials science is enormous. If superconductors can be realized at room temperature and ambient pressure, they would completely transform power transmission, MRI, quantum computing, and controlled nuclear fusion. Even “traditional” high-temperature superconductors have rigid demand in fusion tokamaks, MRI, and particle accelerators. AI accelerating materials discovery means these applications may commercialize sooner than expected.
DAMO's choice to fully open the data is also a smart strategy. Scientific discovery is inherently a public good; open data can attract global researchers to validate and iterate, accelerating the entire field. At the same time, Alibaba can build brand recognition in AI for Science through this achievement, attracting talent and collaboration opportunities.
AI for Science isn't a new story, but in 2026 it's moving from “demo” to “productivity.” DeepMind's AlphaFold transformed protein structure prediction; now systems like ElementsClaw are starting to transform materials discovery. When AI can genuinely make discoveries in the lab — not just draw tables in papers — the scientific research paradigm has truly changed.
AI不会替代科学家,但会用AI的科学家会替代不用AI的科学家。
—— AI for Science领域的共识
AI won't replace scientists — but scientists who use AI will replace scientists who don't.
— Consensus in AI for Science
AI for Science · DAMO Academy · superconducting materials · ElementsClaw · materials discovery · Physical AI · scientific intelligence
Sources · 信源 Sources
本文基于 Dawn Vision 认知引擎处理的 7 个源信号生成,经编辑部人工审核。素材来源:36氪、量子位。
This article was generated from 7 source signals processed by the Dawn Vision cognitive engine, with editorial review. Sources: 36Kr, QbitAI.